March 2025

Ukraine-Russia Conflict : The Beginning

Hey guys! Good to see you again. It is always a pleasure for me to bring to you backstories of International events with prejudice or bias of any kind and to make them simple enough for your understanding. But my biggest thanks is to you for always turning up to read everytime a new post is made. In the previous post, which concluded the series on the Israel-Palestine Crisis, we explored the History Of Ceasefires In The Hamas, Israel Crisis.  Now, it is time to catch up with the moving train of the Russia-Ukraine war from the early days of the Kievan Rus’—a medieval powerhouse rooted in Kyiv—to the turbulent eras of Mongol invasions, Polish-Lithuanian rule, and Cossack revolts. This post will trace the origin of both Russia and Ukraine from the early years down to the USSR era, the Pre and Post Independent era of both countries and the beginning of animosity between both nations. Sit back and enjoy the ride. Ciao. THE GENESIS (9TH – 18TH CENTURY) Kievan Rus’ (9th – 13th Century) – The Kievan Rus’ was the first major East Slavic state, centered around Kyiv, which is now the capital of Ukraine. Established in the 9th century, this medieval state quickly rose to prominence as one of the most powerful entities in Europe. Its ruling dynasty was founded by the Varangians, or Vikings, who established trade routes and fostered connections between Scandinavia, Byzantium, and the Islamic Caliphates. One of the most transformative moments in Kievan Rus’ history occurred in 988 when Prince Volodymyr the Great (known as Vladimir I of Kyiv) embraced Orthodox Christianity and declared it the state religion. This pivotal event brought the state under the cultural and religious influence of the Byzantine Empire, laying the foundations of Orthodox Christian tradition in the region. Modern Ukrainians view Kievan Rus’ as the origin of their nation, emphasizing Kyiv’s centrality in the state. Russians, on the other hand, consider it the birthplace of Russia, claiming historical continuity through Moscow’s rise. This dual claim is a major source of cultural tension between the two nations. Mongol Invasion & Rise of Moscow (13th – 17th Century) – In 1240, the Mongol invasion devastated Kyiv, leading to the fragmentation of the Kievan Rus’. The Mongols, under Batu Khan, established dominance over much of the region, forcing various principalities to pay tribute and weakening centralized rule. While Kyiv’s power diminished, Moscow—a relatively minor principality—began to rise in influence under Mongol suzerainty. Over the following centuries, Moscow grew stronger, ultimately defeating the Mongols at the Battle of Kulikovo in 1380. By the 15th century, Moscow had emerged as a dominant state, unifying surrounding territories and becoming the spiritual and political successor to the Kievan Rus’, at least in the eyes of Russian rulers. Polish-Lithuanian Rule & Cossack Ukraine (16th – 17th Century) – While Moscow consolidated its power, much of western and central Ukraine fell under the control of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. During this period, Ukrainians faced significant cultural and religious pressures as the Catholic Polish rulers sought to impose their influence on the predominantly Orthodox population. In response, the Cossacks—semi-autonomous warrior groups who lived in the steppes of Ukraine—emerged as defenders of Ukrainian identity. Bohdan Khmelnytsky, a Cossack leader, led a major uprising against Polish rule in the mid-17th century. This rebellion culminated in the Pereiaslav Agreement of 1654, where Khmelnytsky sought military support from Moscow. While initially envisioned as a strategic alliance, Moscow used the agreement to assert control over Ukraine, sowing the seeds of future domination. Russian Empire & Suppression of Ukrainian Identity (18th – 19th Century) – By the late 18th century, Catherine the Great fully absorbed Ukraine into the Russian Empire following the partitions of Poland and the defeat of the Ottoman Empire. This marked the complete loss of Ukrainian autonomy. Under Russian imperial rule, Ukrainian culture, language, and national identity were systematically suppressed. Policies of “Russification” were enforced, aiming to assimilate Ukrainians into Russian culture. Ukrainian publications were banned, and the use of the Ukrainian language in schools and churches was heavily restricted. Despite this, Ukrainian intellectuals and nationalists worked covertly to preserve their heritage, laying the groundwork for future independence movements. SOVIET UNION ERA (1917 – 1991) Russian Revolution & Soviet Takeover (1917–1922) – The Russian Revolution of 1917 created an opportunity for Ukraine to assert its independence. In 1918, the Ukrainian People’s Republic was declared, but this independence was short-lived. The Red Army invaded, and by 1922, Ukraine was forcibly incorporated into the Soviet Union as the Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic. Despite promises of autonomy, Ukraine was tightly controlled by the Soviet government, which prioritized centralization and communist ideology over regional independence. The Holodomor (1932–1933): Stalin’s Genocide of Ukrainians – One of the darkest chapters in Ukraine’s history under Soviet rule was the Holodomor, a man-made famine orchestrated by Joseph Stalin’s regime. As part of Stalin’s policy of forced collectivization, Ukrainian farmers were stripped of their grain to meet export quotas and support industrialization efforts elsewhere in the USSR. This policy led to a catastrophic famine, resulting in the deaths of an estimated 3 to 5 million Ukrainians. The Holodomor is widely regarded as an act of genocide, as it targeted Ukraine’s rural population—seen as a threat to Soviet control. Russia continues to deny this characterization, fueling modern-day tensions. World War II & Post-War Soviet Control (1941–1991) – During World War II, Ukraine became a battleground for one of the war’s fiercest conflicts. Nazi Germany invaded Ukraine in 1941, occupying the region until 1944. While some Ukrainians collaborated with the Nazis, hoping to gain independence from the Soviet Union, many others resisted German occupation. The aftermath of the war saw harsh reprisals from the Soviet government against Ukrainian nationalists and resistance fighters. In the decades following WWII, Ukraine remained under strict Soviet control. Efforts to suppress Ukrainian nationalism continued, but a cultural revival began in the 1960s, driven by dissidents and intellectuals. This period, known as the “Shistdesiatnyky” or “Sixtiers,” marked the

Ukraine-Russia Conflict : The Beginning Read More »

ISRAEL vs HAMAS NEWEST CEASEFIRE

Welcome back! I’m thrilled to have you join this space once again as we embark on another exciting journey through the events of the international system. Here, I’ll share my diverse range of interests. So, sit back and enjoy the read. If you missed the first chapter, which focused on the History of Ceasefires in the Hamas-Israel Conflict, don’t fret—you can easily catch up. This chapter promises to delve even deeper into the ongoing ceasefire situation. CURRENT STATE OF THE ISRAEL VS. HAMAS CRISIS The conflict between Israel and Hamas has been ongoing for over 15 months, with the situation remaining highly volatile and complex. The latest round of violence began on October 7, 2023, when Hamas launched a massive surprise assault on southern Israel, resulting in the deadliest single attack on Israelis in history. In response, Israel declared war with the intent to destroy Hamas, leading to extensive military operations in the Gaza Strip. The conflict has caused significant casualties and widespread destruction. As of February 2025, the conflict has resulted in the deaths of at least 61,709 Palestinians, including 17,492 children, and more than 111,588 people have been injured. Additionally, over 14,222 people are still believed to be trapped under rubble or in areas inaccessible to rescuers. The blockade imposed by Israel has cut off essential supplies, exacerbating the suffering of Gaza’s residents. The conflict has caused extensive damage to Gaza’s infrastructure. Almost all homes in Gaza have been damaged or destroyed, along with 80 percent of commercial facilities and 88 percent of school buildings. Healthcare facilities have also been severely affected, with 50 percent of hospitals partially functional. The blockade has led to severe shortages of food, medicine, and other essential supplies. PARTIES INVOLVED IN TRYING TO MEDIATE PEACE The ongoing conflict between Israel and Hamas has drawn the attention of several key international and regional players who are actively involved in mediating peace efforts. Here are the main parties involved: United States The United States has been a significant player in mediating peace between Israel and Hamas. The U.S. has close ties with Israel and has been involved in various diplomatic efforts to broker ceasefires and peace agreements. High-ranking officials, including the U.S. envoy for the global coalition against IS, Brett McGurk, have been instrumental in the negotiations. The U.S. has also provided humanitarian aid and support to the affected population in Gaza. Egypt Egypt has historically played a crucial role in mediating peace between Israel and Hamas. As a neighboring country with significant influence in the region, Egypt has facilitated numerous ceasefire agreements and negotiations. Egyptian officials have been actively involved in brokering deals and providing a platform for dialogue between the conflicting parties. Egypt’s strategic position and diplomatic efforts have been vital in de-escalating tensions and promoting stability in the region. Qatar Qatar has emerged as a key mediator in the Israel-Hamas conflict. Despite its small size, Qatar holds significant influence in the Middle East and has a history of effective mediation efforts. Qatari officials have played a crucial role in brokering ceasefire agreements and facilitating negotiations between Israel and Hamas. Qatar’s involvement has been instrumental in securing temporary truces, releasing hostages, and providing humanitarian aid to Gaza. The country’s strategic positioning and diplomatic initiatives have made it an indispensable player in the peace process. United Nations The United Nations has been actively involved in mediating peace efforts and addressing the humanitarian crisis in Gaza. The UN has called for a full humanitarian ceasefire and increased efforts to provide aid and support to the affected population. Various UN agencies and humanitarian organizations have been working on the ground to deliver essential supplies and services to those in need. The UN’s involvement has been crucial in coordinating international efforts and advocating for a peaceful resolution to the conflict. European Union The European Union has also been engaged in mediating peace efforts between Israel and Hamas. The EU has provided diplomatic support, humanitarian aid, and financial assistance to the affected population in Gaza. European nations have been involved in facilitating dialogue and negotiations, aiming to achieve a lasting peace agreement. The EU’s involvement has been essential in mobilizing international support and promoting stability in the region. Russia and China Russia and China have expressed their willingness to help mediate peace between Israel and Hamas. Both countries have been involved in diplomatic efforts to facilitate negotiations and provide humanitarian aid. Their involvement highlights the global significance of the conflict and the need for a coordinated international response to achieve a peaceful resolution. DEALS AND PRISONER EXCHANGES IN THE ISRAEL VS. HAMAS CRISIS The ongoing conflict between Israel and Hamas has seen several prisoner exchange deals as part of ceasefire agreements.: Recent Prisoner Exchange Deals Numbers of Prisoners Exchanged Challenges and Delays The prisoner exchange process has faced several challenges and delays. For instance, the release of over 600 Palestinian prisoners was delayed due to Israeli security consultations and concerns over the manner in which Hamas conducted the hostage release ceremonies. These delays have strained the ceasefire agreement and raised concerns about the future of the peace process. Humanitarian and Political Implications The prisoner exchanges have significant humanitarian and political implications. They are seen as a crucial step towards alleviating the suffering of the affected populations and promoting peace. However, the process has also highlighted the deep-seated mistrust and tensions between the conflicting parties, making it challenging to achieve a lasting resolution.

ISRAEL vs HAMAS NEWEST CEASEFIRE Read More »

Scroll to Top